top of page
Search

The Real Cost of Health Care Is Eating Our Retirement Income

  • Writer: Rexford Cattanach
    Rexford Cattanach
  • Feb 19
  • 2 min read

Most conversations about health care costs start in the obvious places — medical insurance premiums, deductibles, co‑pays, prescription costs. Those are the bills we actually see, so naturally they dominate how we think about the issue.


But the full cost of health care is much broader, and far less visible. It includes the taxes funding Medicare, Medicaid, Affordable Care Act insurance subsidies, veterans’ health care, public health programs, disability‑related Social Security benefits, and the state and local spending that keeps hospitals, long‑term care systems, and safety‑net programs operating.


When you add it all together, the number is staggering. Total U.S. health care spending recently exceeded $5 trillion annually — roughly 18% of the entire economy. That works out to well over $15,000 per person each year, whether paid directly through premiums and out‑of‑pocket costs, indirectly through employer benefits, or quietly through taxes.


Government already finances a large share of that system. Federal health spending alone now exceeds $2 trillion annually and represents one of the fastest‑growing components of the federal budget. And that share is projected to rise as the population ages.


Recent policy developments add another layer of uncertainty. The 2025 federal tax legislation included meaningful reductions in projected federal health program spending over the coming decade. Historically, when federal funding declines, the overall system rarely gets cheaper. Instead, costs tend to shift — toward states, employers, or households — and eventually back into personal financial plans through taxes, premiums, or reduced benefits.


Most financial plans treat health care primarily as a retirement expense line item, maybe adjusted for inflation. But the exposure is broader than that. Health care is also a tax risk, a longevity risk, an insurance pricing risk, and increasingly a policy risk. Those dimensions often go under‑modeled in otherwise well‑built plans.


That trajectory affects everyone — even those with excellent private insurance.


America’s aging population is a major driver behind these projections. The number of Americans age 65 and older is expected to rise from 58 million in the early 2020s to about 82 million by 2050 — an increase of just over 40%. An older population naturally consumes more health services, relies more heavily on Medicare and long‑term care programs, and increases the fiscal pressure on public health systems.


At the same time, federal projections suggest that health care programs, Social Security obligations, and interest on the national debt will dominate federal spending growth in the coming decade, with total federal spending levels approaching one-quarter of the U.S. economy. That combination shapes taxes, benefits, insurance costs, and ultimately household financial resilience.


Out-of-pocket health care spending in retirement is much more than most of us have planned for premiums, copays, and uncovered medical services.


The Center for Retirement at Boston College reported these bills eat up about one third of a typical retiree Social Security income and almost a quarter of total income.

None of this is a crisis message. It’s a planning message.


Health care today isn’t just a medical issue. It’s a retirement income issue, a tax exposure issue, and a long‑term risk management issue. Ignoring that intersection leaves a gap in otherwise sound financial planning.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
The IRS Has an RMD Plan for Your IRA

The IRS has a plan for drawing down your IRA. Do you have one? How much is spendable depends on many moving parts, to be addressed before and after retirement, and that useful period between retiremen

 
 
 
When Beneficiaries Run Into the 5-year Rule

Three questions can turn an ordinary inherited IRA into a bigger tax problem. Who was named as beneficiary? Had the IRA owner already started required minimum distributions? And was the beneficiary a

 
 
 

Comments


Stay Connected

​​

651-773-8400

Home Office:

Minneapolis-Saint Paul MN

Serving Clients Nationwide

Information on this site is for general education only and is not professional advice or guidance. Keats Group LLC is a financial planning and wealth management firm; Rexford Cattanach is a fiduciary Independent Advisor Representative of AdvisorShare Wealth Management (ASWM), an investment advisor registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Keats Group, Rexford Cattanach and ASWM do not provide legal, accounting, or tax reporting advice. We cannot rely on email communications to authorize, direct, or purchase or sell any security, wire transfer, or other transactions; these must be confirmed verbally before execution.

 

© 2025 by Keats Group LLC. Powered and secured by Wix 

 

bottom of page